United Kingdom: Wild Animals in Circuses
(originally published on DEFRA, UK website)
Wild Animals in Travelling Circuses: The Report of the Chairman of the Circus Working Group PDF (250 KB) has now been published (November 2007).
Animal Welfare Act
Questions and answers
Wild animals in circuses
Ben Bradshaw, the then Minister with responsibility for
animal welfare, announced in the House of Commons in March 2006 that the
government intends to introduce Regulations under the Animal Welfare Act
2006 to ban the use, in travelling circuses, of certain non-domesticated
species whose welfare needs cannot be satisfactorily met in that
environment.
A Circus Working Group has been convened to consider the issue. Members
include representatives of welfare organisations, the circus industry, other
government departments and those who have a relevant expertise in the
welfare of wild animals.
Remit
The remit of the group is to provide, and consider, evidence
relating to the transportation and housing needs of non-domesticated
species. It will look at the possibility of a read across between the
welfare standards for non-domesticated animals being kept in zoos with those
being used in travelling circuses. Training will not be included in the
remit as it is being considered as part of the wider Defra review of the
regulation of animals used in performance.
The Group has set up three sub groups.
The Industry Sub Group and the Welfare Sub Group will each be
asked to provide evidence, and to consider which, if any, non-domesticated
species are suitable for use in travelling circuses. We would expect these
groups to provide evidence relating to:
welfare during transportation,
accommodation standards,
behavioural needs, and whether these can be met in a travelling circus environment,
the future of those animals deemed unsuitable for a circus environment, but already represented in circuses,
the percentage of time that animals are on tour with travelling circuses,
the extent to which they may also be travelling and in temporary accommodation for use in media other than circuses.
Both
the industry and welfare organisations sub-groups have nominated three
people who are qualified to peer review scientific evidence to sit on an
Academic Sub Group. This sub-group’s members are all vets and appropriately
qualified academics. It is currently reviewing relevant scientific evidence
submitted by the other two groups.
Findings
Wild Animals in Travelling Circuses: The Report of the Chairman of the Circus Working Group PDF (250 KB) has now been published (November 2007).
Q
& A
Q. What does the Government intend to do now the report has been
published?
A. The Government will now want to hear reactions to the report and consider
its position.
Q. Why was the group formed?
A. During Parliamentary debates on the Animal Welfare Bill, concerns were
expressed about the use of non-domesticated animals in circuses. Ben
Bradshaw, the Minister for Animal Welfare, announced in March 2006 that he
was minded to introduce Regulations under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 to ban
the use, in travelling circuses, of certain non-domesticated species if
their welfare needs could not be satisfactorily met in that environment.
To assist the Minister in forming a decision on which non-domesticated
species should be banned, Defra invited representatives of welfare
organisations and the circus industry to form a Circus Working Group to
provide and consider evidence relating to the transportation and housing
needs of these animals.
The group’s work was facilitated by Defra, but carried out independently.
Q. Who are the group members?
A. The group as a whole was formed of representatives of the circus
industry, animal welfare organisations and academics and veterinarians. It
was chaired by Mike Radford, Reader in Law at Aberdeen University who has
significant expertise in animal welfare law. The members of the Academic
Panel were:
Mike Lomas BVSc MRCVS JP (Chairman)
|
Professor Sir Patrick Bateson MA PhD ScD FRS Professor of Ethology, University of Cambridge, UK
|
Professor
Ted Friend PhD Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University,
United States |
Dr Marthe
Kiley-Worthington BSc DPhil MPhil Director Centre of Eco-Etho
Research and Education, Drome, France Fellow, Berkeley, University
of California |
Samantha
Lindley BVSc MRCVS Veterinary Surgeon Behaviourist, United Kingdom
|
Professor
Georgia Mason BSc PhD Canada Research Chair in Animal Welfare
University of Guelph, Canada Visiting Professor in Animal Welfare,
Royal Veterinary College, UK |
Peter
Scott MSc BVSc FRCVS RCVS Specialist in Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Biotope Specialist Veterinary Consultancy, Winchester, UK
|
Q. What was the group’s remit?
A. The group looked at only non-domesticated animals, defined as a member of
a species that is not normally domesticated in the British Islands; that is
to say, a species whose collective behaviour, life cycle or physiology
remains unaltered from the wild type despite their breeding and living
conditions being under human control for multiple generations.
It looked at the issues of housing and transportation only, not performance
and training.
Q. Why only non-domesticated animals?
A. The government is not aware of any viable concerns that the welfare needs
of domestic animals cannot be met in a circus environment.
Q. Why not performance and training?
A. Performance and training techniques were excluded as we considered that
if any cruel practices were used in the training of animals it should be
relatively straightforward to mount a prosecution for cruelty under the
Animal Welfare Act. In addition many of the techniques used to train circus
animals would be employed in the training of animals performing in other
media. In these circumstances we concluded that training techniques used to
control animals in circuses was an area that should be looked at in the
context of training for all media when we came to revise the Performing
Animals (Regulation) Act 1925. The performing animal industry outside
circuses, which includes film, TV, stage and advertising, was not a priority
concern of parliament where the focus of attention during the passage of the
bill was wild animal acts in circuses. Although there is a commitment from
Ministers to up-date the 1925 Act, a time table has not yet been decided.
Q. What was the structure of the Working Group?
A.
The group formed two sub-groups, an industry sub-group and a welfare
organisations sub-group. Both of these groups each nominated three
scientists or veterinarians with relevant scientific expertise to form an
academic sub-group.
The industry and welfare organisations sub-groups submitted ‘submissions’
referencing external evidence, mostly published scientific articles. The
academic sub-group was then asked to evaluate the quality of this evidence
and draw a conclusion.
Subsequently, the industry and welfare organisations sub-groups also had a
chance to submit their views on the legal and regulatory context as they saw
it.
The Chair of the whole group, Mike Radford, then wrote a report based on the
academic group’s conclusions and the wider context.
Q. How many circuses are there in the UK?
A. There are currently four circuses that use non-domesticated animals in
their Acts, the information below was supplied by the Industry sub-group.
The Great British Circus |
1 Kangaroo
|
Bobby Robert's Super Circus |
1 Elephant
(touring, but retired from performance) |
Circus Mondao |
3 Zebras
|
Jollys’ Circus |
2
crocodiles |
There are five further circuses that use domesticated animals only (mainly
dogs and horses).
Q. How are circus animals currently protected?
A. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 prevents unnecessary cruelty or suffering to
any vertebrate animal.
In addition, it introduced a new ‘duty of care’ for any animal under the
control of man, which makes owners and keepers responsible for ensuring that
the welfare needs of their animals are met. This duty applies to animals
kept in circuses just as to pets, farmed animals and other domestic and
companion animals.
The five welfare needs include the need:
For a suitable environment (place to live);
For a suitable diet;
To exhibit normal behaviour patterns;
To be housed with, or apart from, other animals (if applicable);
To be protected from pain, injury, suffering and disease.
Q. How is this enforced in relation to circuses?
A. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 is a ‘common informers’ Act. This means that
any individual or group can take a prosecution under the Act. The RSPCA take
the lead on enforcing the Animal Welfare Act in relation to domestic and
companion animals. However, they do not have any formal enforcement powers,
such as power of entry or inspection. Nevertheless, we do not know of any
cases where an RSPCA inspector has been refused entry on request for
inspection at a circus. In addition, local authorities have formal powers of
entry and inspection, which they frequently use to inspect circuses.
Q. What about Wales and Scotland?
A. Any future Regulations on the welfare of wild animals in circuses will
apply to England only. The Welsh Assembly has the power to make Regulations
relating to Wales under the Animal Welfare Act 2006. Scotland has its own
legislation, the Animal Health and Welfare Act (Scotland) 2006. All circuses
using wild animals have their winter quarters based in England, have
previously travelled to Wales and Scotland during the performance season.
Page last modified: November 20, 2007
Page published: April 2nd, 2007
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
www.REXANO.org